The turmoil and crisis going on in nearly every part of the world, be it US or Europe or even Asia, signifies that leaders of substance are missing.
The most promising candidate to qualify for the true leader category in the last few decades was Barack Obama. He had all the credentials of reigniting the political romance that George Bush had slithered with his clumsy, cruel and comic reign for the two terms of presidency before Obama blossomed on the scene. With an opponent who was so easy to dislike, the Obama charm mesmerised the world. A young, educated, black aspirant with an amazing rhetoric and unusual intellect was tailor-made for acting as the black knight out to rescue the White House damsel in distress. He came, he spoke and he conquered the minds and hearts and imagination of a world starved for some real heroism. But the honeymoon lasted for barely 100 days.
As it became difficult to live up to his promises of closing down the Guantanamo Bay, bring health care reforms, withdrawing from Iraq, very soon the world found out that a flowery style of communication is not a compensation for actual delivery of results. His attempts to revive the economy have been termed too myopic to bring a real turnaround and his war strategies have mostly backfired. Thus he falls short of vision and a passion to drive change despite the odds. The growing distance between his claims and his accomplishments has disappointed millions who are starved to find leaders with commitment and accomplishment. Obama thus looks like the same shining star that on close quarters is actually shining because it is burning out. Thus he barely scrapped through a re-election to the second term as American president.
That brings us to Asia. The Chinese leadership style is always less obvious and more subtle yet with a strong impact. Hu Jintao, the president, has a strong background and training in the Communist Party but he is a fourth generation leader and has no experience of the revolution. Thus the style of leadership though strong and solid is more consensus-oriented than previous governments. The emphasis is squarely on technocratic competence and not on personalities and thus the growth of the economy has been a direct result of this focus. Premier Wen Jiabao is again a non-traditional leader who is renowned for his soft-spoken personality and popularity with the common man due to his deliberate focus on developing the smaller cities and the poor man’s life.
Another example of a diminutive leader is India’s Manmohan Singh. His credentials to the post are unique as his qualifications and experience are perhaps the best suited to this chair in the world today. A man of few words he is heading an economy that along with China is a contender for the runners up for world prominence. However, many feel though his quiet style has made him ideal for dealing with the huge democratic bureaucracy within the Indian parliament, his unassertiveness has also made things slip away where control is required. The corruption scandals and the power of Anna Hazare’s protest against the government have revealed flaws in a style where you are trying to please the opposing parties so much that you do not know how to appease public anger against his style of letting things hide till they become too hot to ignore.
Consequently, till today his struggle between the hardcore opportunist and the aspiring strategist is unresolved. His leadership wish list is often exposed by his desperate actions of compromises to remain politically afloat. With such abundance of mediocrity at the top the country has become a victim of people without the integrity and the ability to put their personal insecurities aside and charter the country out of the perpetual turmoil it is embroiled in.
The likes of Quaid-e-Azam, or the last living legend of that era Neslson Mendela, are models that have become almost impossible to reproduce. The reason is very obvious. Those were men beyond themselves; they had integrity to their mission and larger cause and had the passion to sacrifice all personal objectives to achieve that cause. It is the character and values of these leaders which make them larger than life and make them an inspiration for hundreds of years to come. The danger with today’s transitory style of leadership is that they take comfort from their positions and as the positions go so does their leadership. For the people of this world to rediscover peace and prosperity lost, it is imperative to renounce leaders with formal authority and support leaders with moral authority.