{"id":621,"date":"2015-02-11T14:49:36","date_gmt":"2015-02-11T09:49:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/jwt2015\/?p=621"},"modified":"2015-06-09T16:31:02","modified_gmt":"2015-06-09T11:31:02","slug":"cia-torture-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/others\/general\/cia-torture-report\/","title":{"rendered":"CIA &#8216;Torture Report&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/jwt2015\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/CIA-Torture-Report.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-622\" src=\"http:\/\/jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/jwt2015\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/CIA-Torture-Report.jpg\" alt=\"CIA Torture Report\" width=\"448\" height=\"326\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/CIA-Torture-Report.jpg 519w, https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/CIA-Torture-Report-300x218.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">20 Key Findings<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The US Senate Intelligence Committee recently released a summary of a report into the CIA interrogation programme established by US spy chiefs after the terror attacks of 11 September 2001. Here are the highlighted 20 key findings.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1. The CIA&#8217;s use of \u201cenhanced interrogation techniques\u201d was not an effective means of acquiring intelligence or gaining cooperation from detainees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. The CIA&#8217;s justification for the use of its enhanced interrogation techniques rested on inaccurate claims of their effectiveness.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3. The interrogations of CIA detainees were brutal and far worse than those represented to policymakers and others.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4. The conditions of confinement for CIA detainees were harsher than the CIA had represented to policymakers and others.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5. The CIA repeatedly provided inaccurate information to the Department of Justice, impeding a proper legal analysis of the CIA&#8217;s Detention and Interrogation Program.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6. The CIA has actively avoided or impeded congressional oversight of the programme.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7. The CIA impeded effective White House oversight and decision-making.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">8. The CIA&#8217;s operation and management of the programme complicated, and in some cases impeded, the national security missions of other executive branch agencies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">9. The CIA impeded oversight by the CIA&#8217;s Office of Inspector General.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">10. The CIA coordinated the release of classified information to the media, including inaccurate information concerning the effectiveness of the CIA&#8217;s enhanced interrogation techniques.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">11. The CIA was unprepared as it began operating its Detention and Interrogation Program more than six months after being granted detention authorities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">12. The CIA&#8217;s management and operation of its Detention and Interrogation Program was deeply flawed throughout the programme&#8217;s duration, particularly so in 2002 and early 2003.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">13. Two contract psychologists devised the CIA&#8217;s enhanced interrogation techniques and played a central role in the operation, assessments, and management of the CIA&#8217;s Detention and Interrogation Program. By 2005, the CIA had overwhelmingly outsourced operations related to the programme.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">14. CIA detainees were subjected to coercive interrogation techniques that had not been approved by the Department of Justice or had not been authorised by CIA headquarters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">15. The CIA did not conduct a comprehensive or accurate accounting of the number of individuals it detained, and held individuals who did not meet the legal standard for detention. The CIA&#8217;s claims about the number of detainees held and subjected to its enhanced interrogation techniques were inaccurate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">16. The CIA failed to adequately evaluate the effectiveness of its enhanced interrogation techniques.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">17. The CIA rarely reprimanded or held personnel accountable for serious and significant violations, inappropriate activities, and systemic and individual management failures.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">18. The CIA marginalised and ignored numerous internal critiques, criticisms, and objections concerning the operation and management of the CIA&#8217;s Detention and Interrogation Program.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">19. The CIA&#8217;s Detention and Interrogation Program was inherently unsustainable and had effectively ended by 2006 due to unauthorised press disclosures, reduced cooperation from other nations, and legal and oversight concerns.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">20. The CIA&#8217;s Detention and Interrogation Program damaged the United States&#8217; standing in the world, and resulted in other significant monetary and non-monetary costs.<\/p>\n<div id=\"link64_adl_tabid\" style=\"display: none; text-align: justify;\" data-url=\"http:\/\/jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/jwt2015\/wp-admin\/post.php?post=621&amp;action=edit&amp;message=6\">201<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>20 Key Findings The US Senate Intelligence Committee recently released a summary of a report into the CIA interrogation programme established by US spy chiefs after the terror attacks of 11 September 2001. Here are the highlighted 20 key findings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":149,"featured_media":622,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[321,131],"tags":[340,338,342,40,339,341],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/149"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/621\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/622"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}