{"id":34950,"date":"2021-05-26T11:38:25","date_gmt":"2021-05-26T06:38:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/?p=34950"},"modified":"2021-05-26T11:49:53","modified_gmt":"2021-05-26T06:49:53","slug":"who-report-on-the-origins-of-covid-19","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/others\/who-report-on-the-origins-of-covid-19\/","title":{"rendered":"WHO Report on the Origins of Covid 19"},"content":{"rendered":"

WHO Report on the Origins of<\/span> Covid 19<\/span><\/h1>\n

A look at the key takeaways<\/span><\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

1. Markets are the most probable source of major transmission of the virus.<\/span><\/strong>
\n\"\"<\/a>The focus is back on markets that sell animals.
\nCovid-19 made its global debut amid a cluster of cases linked to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan in late December 2019. Researchers tested hundreds of animals in and around the market for the coronavirus \u2014 including animals for sale such as rabbits, hedgehogs, salamanders and birds \u2014 but none tested positive. Neither did thousands of domestic or wild animals in and around Wuhan. Additionally, some early Covid-19 cases that experts identified later, after the coronavirus had begun to spread in other countries, were not linked to the market.
\nTogether, the findings hinted that the market may have helped the virus spread among people because of large crowds but that the Huanan Seafood Market was not the original source.
\nOther markets may have also played a role in the spread of the virus, the investigation found. The earliest known case of Covid-19 was in a person who began showing symptoms on December 8, 2019. That person was not associated with the Huanan market but had recently visited another market.
\nOverall, of 174 people who were sick with Covid-19 in December, more than half had recently gone to a market, where they might have been exposed. An additional 26 percent were exposed to meat and fish or frozen food products.
\nThe failure so far to find an animal that tests positive for SARS-CoV-2 highlights how difficult it is to identify particular species as a potential host, Peter Ben Embarek, lead investigator for the WHO mission and a food safety expert, said in a March 30 news conference. The hunt for where viruses came from takes time \u2014 sometimes years.
\nFuture studies should expand the search for infected animals to wildlife farms that supplied products to the markets linked to Covid-19 cases. The people who work at the farms and those who handled the products should also be tested for antibodies to see if they once had coronavirus infections, the team suggests.
\n2. The coronavirus probably was not widely circulating before December 2019<\/span><\/strong>
\nThere is no evidence yet that the virus was extensively spreading among people before the earliest documented case of Covid-19 in early December 2019, the WHO team found.
\nResearchers combed through more than 76,000 clinical records from October to November 2019. Within those records, there were 92 possible cases of Covid-19. But 67 of those people did not have signs of an infection based on antibody tests done a year later. And all 92 were ultimately ruled out based on the clinical criteria for Covid-19. The records would not have included mild cases in people who never went to the hospital, however, there are potential gaps in the evidence.
\nAdditional evidence of isolated cases in countries outside China at the end of 2019 had hinted that the virus may have spread in those places before Covid-19 was first detected in Wuhan. But those reports have not yet been confirmed, the team wrote.
\nThe timing for when the virus began spreading in China is in line with a recent study that analyzed genetic data and ran simulations of the early days of the pandemic to estimate when the virus may have emerged. The spillover from animals to humans may have happened between mid-October and mid-November 2019, Joel Wertheim and colleagues reported March 18 in Science.
\nAfter the virus transmitted from animals to humans, cases in people with mild symptoms may have helped the virus fly under the radar until December when some people fell severely ill, says Wertheim, an evolutionary biologist and molecular epidemiologist at the University of California, San Diego.
\nWhat’s more, the pandemic itself was far from inevitable. In the simulations, more than two-thirds of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions from animals to humans went extinct, causing only a few infections in people before dying out. Even a virus capable of causing a pandemic that brings the world to its knees wasn’t necessarily a foregone conclusion.
\n3. The \u201clab-leak\u201d hypothesis is unlikely, though hard to completely disprove<\/span><\/strong>
\n\"\"<\/a>Based on a visit to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and interviews with scientists who work there, the report concludes that the virus most likely did not get its start in a lab. Though some experts have called for a full audit of the institute’s labs, the WHO mission was not designed to conduct a forensic investigation.
\nResearchers at the institute considered the lab-leak hypothesis at the beginning of the pandemic and searched the institute’s records but did not find any evidence that anyone there was working with a SARS-CoV-2\u2013like virus. What’s more, antibody tests didn’t turn up any employees with signs of ever having had a coronavirus infection.
\nThe lab leak \u201cis possible, but there’s no evidence to support it,\u201d says Massa Shoura, a biophysicist and genomics expert at Stanford University. Other coronaviruses that caused SARS and MERS made the jump to humans from animals, so it makes sense that it would be the most likely pathway for SARS-CoV-2 as well.
\nYet accumulating the data to prove a negative may be extremely difficult. \u201cI don’t think we’ll ever be able to provide enough evidence to convince people who are convinced that it escaped from a lab that it didn’t,\u201d Wertheim says, adding that: \u201cEven if you find a virus literally identical to SARS-CoV-2 [in animals] \u2026 they could still argue that that virus had previously been found and isolated and brought into a lab and it escaped just the way it was.\u201d
\n4. Experts are far from knowing the coronavirus’s origins<\/span><\/strong>
\nOverall, the report offers few clear-cut conclusions regarding the start of the pandemic. Instead, it provides context for the possibilities and helps hone in on the studies researchers should tackle next.
\nStill, more than a year has passed since the virus made its jump to humans. That time lapse may hinder the investigation if SARS-CoV-2 no longer circulating in its reservoir, the animals that originally harboured it.
\n\u201cWe have to be prepared that we may never find the natural reservoir for this virus,\u201d Wertheim says. But sometimes, all it takes is one good sample to give researchers important clues. Perhaps that’s a chance encounter with the right animal during a wildlife survey, or testing people from the right market.
\nStepping even further back, researchers need to better understand the diversity of coronaviruses in bats and other wildlife in southeastern Asia, Shoura says. That means compiling a \u201cdictionary\u201d of the viruses found there to help researchers track viral evolutionary history, something the WHO team also recommends.
\n\u201cWe have only scratched the surface of these very complex studies that need to be conducted,\u201d Ben Embarek said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WHO Report on the Origins of Covid 19 A look at the key takeaways 1. Markets are the most probable source of major transmission of the virus. The focus is back on markets that sell animals. Covid-19 made its global debut amid a cluster of cases linked to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan in …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":34951,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[11111,5,131,11116,4],"tags":[574,1163,4536,257,10554,1000,40,2231,537,3411,4541,258,2302,2457,10271,11232,8467,3790],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34950"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34950"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34950\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34955,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34950\/revisions\/34955"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jworldtimes.com\/old-site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}